Case Report
Asthma Caused by African Hedgehog: A Report of Two Cases
Gema Rubio, Rocío Mourelle*, Fernando Pineda, Isabel Ojeda, Alexandra Yago and Pedro
Ojeda
Department of Allergy and Immunology, Clínica de Asma y Alergia Dres Ojeda, Madrid, Spain
*Corresponding author: Rocío Mourelle, Department of Allergy and Immunology, Clínica de Asma y Alergia Dres Ojeda, Madrid, Spain
Published: 08 Aug, 2017
Cite this article as: Rubio G, Mourelle R, Pineda F, Ojeda
I, Yago A, Ojeda P. Asthma Caused by
African Hedgehog: A Report of Two
Cases. Ann Clin Case Rep. 2017; 2:
1415.
Abstract
Background: There are very few published studies involving hedgehogs as an allergenic source, being
urticarial reactions the most frequently described. The presence of hedgehogs at homes is spreading
widely throughout the population and in the last 2 years two publications have demonstrated the
presence of different hedgehog´s protein families as responsible for both respiratory and cutaneous
symptoms.
Methods: We present 2 patients with asthmatic symptoms after direct contact with hedgehogs at
home. African pygmy hedgehog urine and bedding extracts were prepared and a prick-test was
carried out with the extract. SDS-PAGE IgE immunoblotting assays were also performed for both
patient´s serum.
Results: Skin prick tests carried out showed positive results to hedgehog urine and in the first
case also to bedding. The SPS-PAGE revealed in the first case an IgE-reactivity with proteins
with apparent molecular weight of approximately 40 kDa which could correspond to an elastase
belonging to the acidic mammalian chitinase-like elastase family and in the second case revealed
proteins with apparent molecular weights between 30 and 60 kDa which may concur with lipocalins
and albumins.
Conclusion: To our knowledge this is the second report of hedgehog hypersensitivity which
confirms the presence of acidic mammalian chitinase-like elastase family, lipocalins and albumins
members as the relevant allergens.
Introduction
According to the European Community Health survey back in the early 90’s [1], 4.5% of the
population between 20 and 44 years old suffer from asthma. In Spain, the new results of Alergológica
2015 [2] determine asthma as the second cause of assistance to an allergy clinic (21.1% of all patients). Investigating the cause of this illness is not always easy, requiring a very deep anamnesis.
Nowadays having other exotic animals as pets rather than dogs and cats is spreading widely
throughout the population. Hedgehogs are more commonly becoming household pets, being
African pygmy hedgehogs (Atelerixalbiventris) the most common. Very few publications regard
hedgehogs as the origin of an allergic reaction and of these, urticarial reactions [3] are the most frequently described. In 2016 three cases of hedgehog allergy were published, demonstrating a
carboxypeptidase, chitinase-like and chymotrypsin-like elastase family members as the relevant
allergens [4].
Previously, in 2015 another publication reported a patient with asthma caused by two proteins
which could correspond to lipocalins (25-27 kDa) and albumins (67 kDa) families, according to
their molecular weight [5].
Case Presentation
Case 1
A 41 year old Caucasian woman was referred by internal medicine to carry out an allergologic
study after requiring one month of hospitalization due to an asthmatic crisis. She had previous
medical history of diffuse multinodular goiter without active treatment; 20 cigarettes/year smoker
until one month before hospitalization and she had been diagnosed of allergic rhinitis cause by
pollen hypersensitivity and urticaria related to Anisakishy per sensitivity 3 years before this episode.
No known family history of asthma.
She reported no previous respiratory symptoms, beginning
5 months before attending our consulting room with respiratory
problems manifesting as moderate persistent rhino conjunctivitis,
dyspnea, dry cough, and wheezing requiring sustained treatment
with inhaled corticosteroids, long term bronchodilators and frequent
bronchodilator rescue medication. She also related daily transparent
runny nose which improved being away from home. However, despite
the medication, the clinical situation required medical emergency
assistance and hospitalization.
The physical examination showed a normal cardiac and
pulmonary auscultation and only a slight congestive nasal mucous
membrane, without any visible polyps.
During hospitalization levels of alfa-1-antitripsine and a blood
panel were performed (both with levels according to normal values),
serum total IgE, with a result of 537.7 UI/ml and specific IgE to grass
pollen and house dust mites which were all negative. The pulmonary
function test revealed a forced volume vital capacity FVC of 104%,
a forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) of 86.9%, FEV1/
FVC of 63% and a forced expiratory flow between 25% and 75%
(MMEF 25-75) of 91.2% of normal, with a significant response after
bronchodilatation test (FEV1 increase of 21%). The chest CT scan
showed no pathology.
Prick testing was performed with a standard battery of
aeroallergens including pollen (grasses, olive, Plain tree, Cynodon,
Cupressus, Arizonica, Artemisia, Chenopodium, acacia, ash tree and
Salsolaspecies), house dust mites (Dermatophagoidespteronyssinus,
Dermatophagoidesfarinae), animal dander (cats and dogs), fungi
(Alternaria and Aspergillus species) and Anisakis, with positive
results for Anisakis (9 mm × 5 mm) and artemisia (4 mm × 4 mm).
A new pulmonary function test including bronchodilatation test
and fraction of exhaled nitric oxide were also carried out, showing
a normal respiratory function with a negative bronchodilatation test
and a fraction of exhaled nitric oxide (FENO)<5 ppb.
The patient lived in an urban residence without any hobbies with
allergy risk. She had owned an African pygmy hedgehog for the last
2 years. She reported one episode of hand itching, eyelid angioedema
and tearing after holding the hedgehog and rubbing her eyes. She
therefore had given the hedgehog to a member of her family, one
month before attending our consulting room with a significant
clinical improvement once avoiding contact with the hedgehog. She
recounted no contact with other animals.
New prick test were carried out with an extract of the hedgehog´s
urine (6 mm x 6 mm) and bedding (11 mm x 7 mm). An SDS-PAGE IgE
immunoblotting assays with the patients’ serum was also performed,
revealing an IgE reactivity with proteins with molecular weight of
approximately 40 kDa (Figure 1).
Case 2
A 52 year old Caucasian female patient without previous medical
history or hobbies with allergy risk recounted a one year history of
moderate persistent dyspnoea, cough and rhinitis without clinical
response despite continuous treatment with inhaled corticosteroids
and long term bronchodilators. She clearly described symptomatic
worsening at home where she had an African pygmy hedgehog since
two years before symptomatic onset. She personally cleaned the cage
and bedding, suffering worsening of the dyspnoea in every occasion.
She had no other pets or contact with animals.
Prick testing revealed negative results for grasses, olive tree, Plain
tree, Cupressus Arizonica, Plantain, Chenopodium species, house
dust mites, animal dander (cats, dogs and rabbit), fungi (Alternaria
and Aspergillus species) and were only positive to hedgehog´s urine
extract (6 mm x 6 mm). The same prick tests were performed in ten
random patients from our clinic who were used as negative controls,
having all of them negative results to hedgehog urine.
A pulmonary function test revealed FVC of 100.7%, FEV1 of 121%, FEV/FVC of 92% and MMEF25-75 of 156% of normal.
However, the FENO resulted in 128 ppb. The test was repeated 2
months after avoiding the hedgehog contact with a result of 30ppb,
after this period, the patient recounted being asymptomatic. SDSPAGE
IgE immunoblotting assays with the patients’ serum were
performed and revealed IgE reactivity to proteins with apparent
molecular weights between 30 and 60 kDa (Figure 2). The levels of
specific IgE against hedgehog urine from the patient´s serum was
quantified obtaining a result of 0.97 kU/L.
Figure 1
Figure 1
Panel A: Left: SDS-PAGE with Coomasie dye; Right: silver dye.
MW: Molecular Weights. Lane 1 shows in both cases binding to different molecular weight proteins.
Panel B: Left: Immunoblotting assays with a non-allergic patients’ serum (Lane 1 and 2). No antigenic recognition can be seen. Right: Immunobloting assay with
patient from case 1´s serum in which Ig E recognition is revealed, being more intense near 40 kDa and more subtle at 75 kDa and 15 kDa.
The molecular weight markers (in kDa) are shown on the left.
Figure 2
Figure 2
SDS PAGE and Western blot from case 2 patient´s serum (P)
reveals IgE reactivity to proteins with molecular weights between 30 and 60
kDa and serum from a non-allergic patient (C) without reactivity.
WM: Molecular Weights. Lane 1: hedgehog urine. The molecular weight
markers (in kDa) are shown on the left.
Discussion
To our knowledge, we present the second cases of patients with demonstrated allergy to African pygmy hedgehog. In the first case, the pattern of IgE reactivity is similar to the case described by Gonzalez et al. [4] revealing a protein from the acidic mammalian chitinase-like elastase family. In the second case, IgE immunoblotting showed IgE reactivity to proteins that may correspond to lipocalins and albumins members, as described in the publication by Nuñez et al. [5]. Animal allergy is usually limited to the animal’s fur except for a few exceptions in which we consider other options as it occurs with protein Can f5 in dogs. The appearance of new cases showing the same proteins in hedgehog allergy which have no relation to fur as the cause of the symptoms also demonstrates the importance of searching for different possible origins when approaching pet allergy. On the other hand, these cases illustrate the importance of a sound anamnesis, considering any possible allergenic source as the cause of the patient’s respiratory symptoms. In the first case, some allergy testing to common inhalant allergens were previously performed, yielding negative results and being the patient labelled as “intrinsic asthmatic”. In the second case, the primary care physician started the patient on anti-asthmatic medication but did not consider the possibility of deriving her for allergologic assessment. Since owning exotic pets is an increasing trend in our society Panel A: Left: SDS-PAGE with Coomasie dye; Right: silver dye. MW: Molecular Weights. Lane 1 shows in both cases binding to different molecular weight proteins. Panel B: Left: Immunoblotting assays with a non-allergic patients’ serum (Lane 1 and 2). No antigenic recognition can be seen. Right: Immunobloting assay with patient from case 1´s serum in which Ig E recognition is revealed, being more intense near 40 kDa and more subtle at 75 kDa and 15 kDa. The molecular weight markers (in kDa) are shown on the left.[6]
, both primary care and specialized care physicians should be aware of this potential allergenic source and include specific questions in the anamnesis of patients newly presenting with asthma or having unexplained worsening of existing asthma.Conflict of Interest Statement
All of the authors declare having received scientific help from Diater laboratory by the fulfilment of the in vitro allergy study. Fernando Pineda is actually an employer at Diater laboratory.
References
- Janson C, Anto J, Burney P, Chinn S, de Marco R, Heinrich J, et al. The European Community Respiratory Health Survey: What are the main results so far? European Community Respiratory Health Survey II. Eur Respir J. 2001; 18: 598-611.
- Delgado J. Alergológica 2015. Factores epidemiológicos y socioeconómicos de las enfermeades alérgicas en España en 2015. SEAIC. adrid. Editorial Draft grupo de comunicación healthcare. 2017. Capítulo 4: Asma Bronquial; 144-169.
- JA Fairley, J Suchniak, AS Paller. Hedgehog hives. Arch Dermatol. 1999; 135: 561-563.
- Gonzalez-de-Olano D, Muñoz-García E, Haroun-Diaz E, Bartolome B, Pastor-Vargas. Allergy to hedgehog with carboxypeptidase and chitinase-like and chymotrypsin-like elastase family members as the relevant allergens. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2016; 116: 256-257.
- Nuñez-Acevedo B, Dominguez-Ortega J, Rodriguez-Jimenez B, Kindelan-Recarte C, Jimeno-Nogales L. Hedgehog Allergy: New Pet, Old Allergens. J Investig Allergol Clin Immunol. 2015; 25: 376-377.
- Diaz-Perales A, Gonzalez-de-Olano D, Perez-Gordo M, Pastor-Vargas C. Allergy to uncommon pets: new allergies but the same allergens. Front Immunol. 2013; 4: 492.